THE DEATHS OF IAN STONE
The Death of Ian Stone hits in with a conceptually wild premise that if nothing else immediately plunges it into different territory from the average horror film a man keeps waking up in different lives, encountering familiar faces in each and being pursued by creatures that kill him, only for him to then wake up in a different life and start the process all over again. Imagine the reality bendings of the great Dark City (1998) reconceived as a horror film, thrown in along with maybe something like Jacobs Ladder (1990). Take out the creatures and there is a surprising similarity to the much more conceptually sophisticated The Nines (2007), which came out the same year.
For all that it has a novel and unique premise, The Deaths of Ian Stone is not a great film. Dario Pianas direction is competently average and he at least keeps one involved in wanting to know what is going on. The main frustration is that the film never explains what is going on. Screenwriter Brendan Hood wrote the equally confusing They (2002), which similarly created interesting dream creatures and then failed to explain anything about them. [PLOT SPOILERS] Here we are given an explanation that Mike Vogel is one of the Harvesters who has rebelled against their society. It becomes apparent why they are hunting him but the script never explains why he keeps waking up in a different life each time after they kill him. Is this some kind of virtual simulation, an alternate reality or what? Who is creating these simulations or alternate lives the Harvesters? Why is Ian ignorant of who or what he is for the bulk of the film? If he keeps waking up in a new life, how come other non-Harvester people such as Christina Coles Jenny keep being replicated as well? Surely if the Harvesters are creating all of these simulations, they would not know the significance of Christina and mystery man Michael Feast to replicate them as well? If they did know, then why is there such an issue about keeping knowledge of Jenny hidden from them? The great frustration of Brendan Hoods scripts here and in They is that he writes in terms of surprises, twists and wild concepts but fails at creating any backwards logic to support such conceptually out-there ideas. [To Hoods credit, he claims that much of The Deaths of Ian Stone was altered from his script].
Mike Vogel, later to appear in Cloverfield (2008), as the lead in the tv series Under the Dome (2013-5) and at one point top-listed to play Captain Kirk in Star Trek (2009), seems miscast. Vogel is very much a physical (as opposed to an intellectual) actor. He is the sort of actor you would immediately think to cast as a jock and as such is perfect for the part of the ice hockey player here but not someone you think of as an heroic or romantic lead. Were Vogel not a complete unknown, one would think that his casting here had something to do commercial/box-office necessity rather than someone chosen because they are best suited to the role. Christina Cole, a rising British actress, has a lovely sweetness and innocence in her part and is at least perfectly cast. Jamie Murray, who subsequently gained attention as a regular on the second season of tvs excellent Dexter (2006-13), seems to be relishing the campy bitchery and positively plays to the gallery.
Dario Piana subsequently went onto direct Lost Boys: The Thirst (2010)
The other films produced by Stan Winston include: The Day the World Ended (2001), Earth vs. the Spider (2001), How to Make a Monster (2001), She Creature (2001), Teenage Caveman (2001) and Wrong Turn (2003). As director, Stan Winston also made Pumpkinhead/Vengeance: The Demon (1988) and Upworld/A Gnome Named Gnorm (1991).
Full film available online here:-