|
There still seems a lot of Woody Allen in the way that Marshall Brickman writes Lovesick is very similar to Allens Play It Again Sam (1972) which, instead of Lovesicks ghost of Sigmund Freud popping in to give advice, had the ghost of Humphrey Bogart appearing to give Woody Allen romantic advice. It is not difficult to imagine Woody Allen playing the role Dudley Moore does here in fact, Allen would have been a far preferable choice to the bumbling pratfoolery that Moore lets pass for a performance. Lovesick is unfortunately not a terribly good film its plot is too sprawling and longwinded and Dudley Moores professional ethical dilemma too banal to care about much. Brickman also has scenes where Moore is clearly abusing Elizabeth McGovern and causing considerable irritation around the house, but he lets these drop they are scenes that could have been cut from the film altogether for the amount of difference they make. Alec Guiness makes an appealingly wry Sigmund Freud, reading up on the latest pop psychology and drug therapy, and Ron Silver has an amusing supporting role as an egocentric actor. The developing scenes between Dudley Moore and Eliabeth McGovern have a nice soft-eyed intimacy they are all on her part, but it is easy to see why half the characters in the film fall in love with her. Towards the end, Marshall Brickman does rise to make some mildly acerbic comments about the therapeutic profession in one rather nice speech he has Dudley Moore tell his neurotic middle-aged patient to go out and live life, and the ghost of Freud departs with a shrug, It [psychotherapy] was an experiment, it should never have become an industry. However, these sharpened barbs are something the film should have arrived at much sooner than this.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||