The studios faltering came after they went through a long and protracted negotiation process with parent company Disney over who owned the rights to their characters with Pixar threatening not to renew their contract with the studio. This was eventually settled with Pixar CEO John Lasseter being appointed chief creative officer at Disney in 2006 as part of the deal. With the rights back in their hands, Pixar set out on a new track of producing sequels to their popular hits. Toy Story 3 (2010) emerged with popular acclaim but then there was the decidedly weaker Cars 2 (2011) and now Monsters University, followed by the Finding Nemo sequel Finding Dory (2016) and and Cars 3 (2017). It is hard to quite say what has gone wrong with Pixar but the point where they set off on the path of making these sequels has become a creative decline. Just before this process began, the studio was at their absolute peak artistically with their two finest films Wall-E and Up; since then it has been a deteriorating output that consists of these sequels and 3D re-releases of their classics with the only original fare to emerge during this time being Brave (2012), a film that suffered badly from a troubled creative process and uncertainty about what it wanted to be.
Monsters University is designed as a prequel to Pixars fourth film Monsters, Inc., telling the story of how Mike and Sulley became best friends and tracing the course of their journey from novices to scarers at Monsters Inc. The film reunites voice work from both Billy Crystal and John Goodman as Mike and Sulley, as well as supporting appearances from Steve Buscemi, Frank Oz and John Ratzenberger in their same original voice roles. Direction has been handed over to Dan Scanlon, previously a Disney storyboard artist who made his first film for Pixar as co-director of the short Mater and the Ghostlight (2006).
Monsters, Inc. is a well-loved and universally popular film so it is hard to see how a repeat of the same could go wrong for Pixar. Unfortunately, it does. I would probably have liked Monsters University a good deal better if it was being made by a Pixar imitator like Blue Sky Studios, the makers of the interminable Ice Age films, or DreamWorks, the makers of the Shrek and Madagascar films, who between them have reduced the animated sequel to the soullessly formulaic. In terms of what we comes to expect from a Pixar film, Monsters University disappoints.
I found the premise of the Monsters, Inc. monsters harvest the scares of children limited. It worked well enough for the original but I wondered what new things the sequel could find to do with it. The answer is not much. It is a film that is mostly drawn from our familiarity with the characters. The rest plays out as a series of occasionally cute gags set around the idea of monsters at a university this is a Pixar film that, for once, does not easily stretch to an international appeal in that so much of it is drawn from the American notion of a university as based around fraternities, jocks and hazing rituals. Sometimes this is cute and amusing. On the other hand, I kept waiting for the Pixar sense of wacky humour to kick in and unfortunately none of Monsters University does in this regard there are never any scenes where one sits in a riotous belly laugh at what is happening before us. Equally, there are no moments in the film where you are going awwww at the cuteness of what is going on as you frequently were with the character of Boo in Monsters, Inc..
In terms of story, Monsters University plays into disappointingly traditional story arcs. Much of what happens is a straight cobbling from Revenge of the Nerds (1984) and sequels the team of losers and nerdish underdogs who seek to triumph in an all-important showdown with the jock fraternity where they eventually discover they can use their useless skills and abilities to their advantage. All that seems missing is the requisite love interest where the underdog would be attracted to a girl who is out of his league. Mikes story throughout the film is that of a standard little guy who eventually triumphs because he believes in himself and his and Sulleys story one of how friendship forms and wins out. All are serviceably told but eminently predicable.