I probably havent seen enough the gungy low-budget 1970s vampire films from South of the Border and Asia or from people like Al Adamson and Jess Franco to be able to make a qualitative statement here but Vampire Dog surely runs a strong contender for the worst vampire film ever made. Even if its basic premise was dragging the bottom of the barrel, Zoltan ... Hound of Dracula at least took itself seriously and proved semi-watchable; Vampire Dogs crucial failing is that it takes none of itself seriously. Vampire Dog is made as a childrens film and normally people expect as a critic that you should take a few points off it for those reasons. Maybe so. It also means that the filmmakers take a good many more excuses to be conceptually lazy. Much of the film feels written down to the kids. The scenes of them at school have the whiff of adult filmmakers trying to grasp a hip vibe and missing it by a mile.
In fact, you wonder why the filmmakers even decided to use the notion of a vampire dog aside from the fact that vampires are cool with the tween generation at the moment and the title vampire dog certainly gets ones attention on the dvd shelves. However, the dog has so little in the way of characteristics that we associate with a vampire that the concept seems watered down almost to the point of non-existence. About all that we have is that the vampire dog is said to have lived a very long time (although this has no relevance to the script). The dog is also said to have an allergy to daylight, although this is frequently contradicted by the film, which has the dog running around in broad daylight. Perhaps the most ridiculous aspect of the entire film is the part where the dog doesnt drink blood this is a childrens film remember and so the scriptwriter has it eating red jelly. Yes, a vampire dog with an obsessive hunger to eat red fucking jelly. (There is some vague justifying nonsense about it needing to do so because the jelly has the qualities of haemoglobin that it needs). Even then the dog is far from a predator and monster we associate with a vampire and no more than the wisely figure that turns up in childrens films to inspire the young hero to go out there and be yourself, you have it inside you. Another failing of the film is the typical childrens film cliche that no matter what a world-shattering discovery the kids encounter, it only ever comes down to it providing the fulcrum for them to find the self-worth to triumph in a banal competition in this case, a Battle of the Bands competition where Collin McKechnies only story arc is simply to realise he has the skills to play in public as a drummer.
If this did not give you an idea of how bad the film is, then the inanity of much of its playing surely would. We have two slapstick villains lady mad scientist Amy Matysio and her assistant Ron Pederson who have no purpose in the film other than to act ridiculously over-the-top and be the butt of slapstick pratfalls whenever they appear on screen. The most absurd scene in the entire film is the one where Ron Pederson is hypnotised by the vampire dog and made to act like a chicken and squat atop a packet of eggs in the school kitchen and squawk. There is also a later scene at the dog pound where Fang hypnotises Matysio and Pederson into running around and acting like cats. We also get prize pieces of bad dialogue like Amy Matysios announcement I need the DNA of a vampire dog to perfect the formula for my anti-aging serum.
Geoff Anderson, a former visual effects artists, made his directorial debut with Vampire Dog and subsequently went on to make another talking animals film with Step Dogs (2013), followed by the family film The Adventure Club (2017).
(Winner Worst Film in this sites Worst Films of 2012 list).