|
A Serbian Film was considered so extreme that it was cut or outrightly banned in fairly much every country it has screened. In fearless pursuit of material, this author has managed to locate an uncut copy even if it is a pirated English subtitled screener where all the actors have been dubbed into Russian by a single voice. A Serbian Film appears to have been made for the sole purpose of setting out to offend peoples sensibilities director Srdana Spasojevic made various statements to the effect that he made it as a kick in the eye against the constant censorship that went on in the former Soviet republic of Yugoslavia. It should be warned that A Serbian Film is not recommended for the casual genre viewer it is about as hardcore as it gets and certainly pushes the material into some genuinely uncomfortable places. Srdana Spasojevics desire to offend hits in from the opening scene where we see Srdan Todorovichs young son uncomprehendingly watching one of his fathers pornographic videos. In the subsequent scene, a marital disagreement between Srdan Todorovich and wife Jelena Gavrilovic ends up with him sexually forcing himself on her. We are gradually drawn into the world of the porno film shoot. Nothing is explained about what Srdan Todorovich is supposed to be doing but we know the answer to this from the press that A Serbian Film has been getting. There is a sense of foreboding as the film starts shooting at the orphanage and men in black fatigues surround Todorovich holding cameras and follow him with military precision. Things becomes increasingly more disturbed as we get to a scene where Todorovich is being given a blowjob while film of children licking ice cream plays out on video screens above him Srdana Spasojevic is outrageous enough to abruptly cut between Todorovich reaching his orgasm in the womans mouth and one of the children licking her lips. This paedophilia-by-editing-suggestion continues in the subsequent scene where Todorovichs police officer brother Slobodan Bestic is watching videos from Todorovichs sons birthday party while with a hooker where we get similar cuts made between the blowing up of a balloon and the hooker orally performing on him. Things become increasingly more upsetting from there. In one scene, Srdan Todorovich is taken to a bare room and sees a woman (Ana Sakic) being battered by one of the guards and she is then made to give him a blowjob, as all the while a child sits watching on. When he objects, he is grabbed around the throat by one of the guards and made to continue, being told to beat the woman until he ejaculates across her face. The films single most stomach-churning scene one that tips an uneasy edge between pushing buttons and heading over into the genuinely sick is a scene where Srdan Todorovich is made to watch a film where we see a woman giving birth to a child in gory, no-holds-barred detail and then the chauffeur (Miodrag Krcmarik) comes in, drops his pants and fucks the newborn baby. Thankfully, everything is only suggested, as one has doubts that they would be able to keep their lunch down if the film tried to push any further past this point. Things become even more disturbed. There is a completely whacked scene where a drugged Srdan Todorovich is made to have sex with a chained woman and is urged to beat her, where he starts to get into it, is then handed a machete and in the midst of his drugged frenzy wields it to hack off her head only to continue to hump her headless body until he reaches his orgasm. The film comes together in an exceedingly nasty climax [PLOT SPOILERS]. Here Srdan Todorovich is joined by a masked figure and forced at gunpoint to have sex with two hooded figures who are bound to a bed. In the midst of their frenzy, the hoods and masks are whipped off to show that Todorovichs co-orgiast is his brother Slobodan Bestic and that Bestic is fucking Todorovichs wife Jelena Gavrilovic while Todorovich is having sex with his own young son.
A Serbian Film is a grim and nasty work. It is morally unpleasant viewing but is also undeniably effective in terms of pushing an audience way beyond any comfort zone and forcing them to watch taboo acts being enacted. It is hard to defend films like this or other works such as Salo or 120 Days of Sodom (1975) and Cannibal Holocaust (1979) that similarly push cinema to absolute extremes because the issues they stir up are surrounded by so much in the way of moral shock. These works are defensible in the sense that works of confrontational artists such as Damien Hirst, Andres Serrano and Chris Ofili are defensible and so long as one needs not look upon art as something that must have a sense of morally and emotionally uplifting purpose. They are films designed to shake you up and upset. They take you to a certain place the sort of taboo areas that no sane individual should ever hope to have to traverse in their lifetime and make you confront the actuality of what you see. That is their sum emotional effect, which is surely just as defensible as a film like Eat Pray Love (2010) that desires to make you feel good and inspired about the world.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||