|
Against the Dark is one attempt on Steven Seagals part to reinvent himself in a different genre namely the zombie film. The zombie film received a major resurrection in the 00s, following the success of films like 28 Days Later (2002), Dawn of the Dead (2004) and Shaun of the Dead (2004). Against the Dark is a clear attempt to make Steven Seagal into post-catastrophe zombie slayer. Although, the film seems uncertain if it is being a zombie or a vampire film as the zombies seem a mix of either, being mindless and ravening yet driven by a need to devour human blood rather than eat flesh. In this respect, there are times that Against the Dark starts to homage Richard Mathesons classic I Am Legend (1954) in particular, lines like What if we are the only ones left? It means were the monsters now, which sum up the whole of I Am Legends remarkable ending far better than any of the film versions The Last Man on Earth (1964), The Omega Man (1971) and I Am Legend (2007) have. The surprise about Against the Dark is that, even though Steven Seagal produces the film, he is on screen for surprisingly little of it. In the first 40 minutes, he appears in only about five minutes of screen time. This works somewhat to the films advantage. I have often found Steven Seagals action moves to be needlessly sadistic and focused around the brutal and nasty despatch of opponents; his absence serves to place the focus on the more human dramatic situation of the survivors and their trek through the hospital corridors. Certainly, Seagal and his action moves take over in the second half of the film, where they at least come with a passable efficiency. That said, even as a zombie film, Against the Dark is at best routine. The film is moderately gory, although the splatter effects and zombie attacks are nothing spectacular and certainly nothing we have not seen before. Amid the survivors, the characters tensions are passable but few of them stand out with any distinction. The entire film was shot in Romania and all seems to take place in the same limited sections of hospital corridor. The major complaint I had was the logic of how the Hunters despatch the zombies. The weapon of choice used by Steven Seagal and associates seems to be swords and other such bladed weapons. When you are despatching opponents whose bloody is highly infectious, it seems to make little sense to be using hand weapons that so readily splash blood and moreover to be wielding said weapons with no protective covering other than cool-looking black leather jackets and nothing covering the swordsmans hands.
The other complaint about Against the Dark is the big false build-up about the military preparing to bomb the section of city where the hospital is in order to raze the zombies. The big countdown to the ruthless military bombing of the area is a cliche common to many films. Much of the latter section involves the survivors in a race to get out before the bombing occurs. Instead, the film arrives at a big anticlimax where the bombing never happens and the soldiers who were muttering mutiny congratulate each other and say lets go home now in the final scene, seemingly having already forgotten they were prepared to kill each other only a few minutes before.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||