The Science Fiction, Horror and Fantasy Film Review
Reviews
All Titles
· A – B · C – D
· E – F · G – H
· I – K · L – M
· N – O · P – R
· S – T · U – Z
Sections
Science-Fiction
· A – D · E – K
· L – Q · R – Z
Horror
· A – D · E – K
· L – Q · R – Z
Fantasy
· A – D · E – K
· L – Q · R – Z
New
· Most Recent Additions
Annual Best and Worst
· 2011 · 2010
· 2009 · 2008
· 2007 · 2006
· 2005 · 2004
· 2003 · 2002
· 2001 · 2000
· 1999 · 1998
· 1997 · 1996
· 1995 · 1994
Contact
· Contact This Site
Link to This Page With



    A STUDY IN TERROR
    Rating½

     
    UK. 1965.
    Director – James Hill, Screenplay – Derek Ford & Donald Ford, Producer – Henry E. Lester, Photography – Desmond Dickinson, Music – John Scott, Special Effects – Wally Veevers, Makeup – Tom Smith, Production Design – Vetchinsky. Production Company – Compton-Tekli Film Productions/Sir Nigel Films.
    Cast:
    John Neville (Sherlock Holmes), Donald Houston (Dr Watson), Anthony Quayle (Dr Murray), Robert Morley (Mycroft Holmes), Frank Finlay (Inspector Lestrade), Barry Jones (Edward Osbourne, Duke of Shires), John Fraser (Lord Carfax), Adrienne Corri (Angela Osbourne), Judi Dench (Sally Young), Barbara Windsor (Annie Chapman), Edina Ronay (Mary Kelly), Kay Walsh (Cathy Eddowes)
     

     
    Plot: London at the height of the Jack the Ripper murders. Sherlock Holmes’s curiosity is piqued after he is anonymously sent a medical kit with one of the surgical knives missing. The trail leads Holmes to Lord Carfax, whose son Michael, the shame of the family, has been missing for two years. Further investigation takes Holmes to Whitechapel on the trail of the murdered prostitutes where he comes to believe that the missing Michael might be the killer.
     

     
    Although it is one of the more forgotten Sherlock Holmes screen adaptations, A Study in Terror is increasingly gaining a reputation. Firstly, because it was the first Sherlock Holmes film to have the fictional super-detective Holmes trying to solve the contemporary real world case of the Jack the Ripper murders. This encounter between fiction and real-life has since become commonplace, most notably in the film Murder By Decree (1979), which could almost be a scene-for-scene remake of A Study in Terror.

    Furthermore, A Study in Terror was the first film to put forward what has now become known in Ripperology (the study of the Jack the Ripper murders) as the Royal Freemason Conspiracy. A Study in Terror refers to an aristocratic family other than the Windsors, but were one to change the names then the film could be iterating the Royal Freemason Conspiracy in essence. What is remarkable about this is that A Study in Terror in fact predates the putting forward of the Royal Freemason Conspiracy by Stephen Knight in the book Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution (1976). Despite its conspiratorial ludicrousness and lack of factual basis, the Royal Freemason Conspiracy is the one Ripper theory that has gained the greatest prevalence on film as also seen in the likes of Murder By Decree, Jack the Ripper (tv mini-series, 1988) and From Hell (2001).

    The film almost certainly coasts by on the mid-1960s popularity of the Anglo-horror cycle that had been created by Hammer Films. Indeed, A Study in Terror could easily be a companion piece to Hammer’s venture into Sherlock Holmes with The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959). The film is surprisingly faithful to Arthur Conan Doyle with John Neville’s Holmes being a close facsimile to the Holmes on the written page. Holmes’s intuitive leaps are well written, unlike Murder By Decree, which tended to forget about this side of the character. The film is also surprisingly faithful to most of the details of the Jack the Ripper case – even quoting the ‘Dear Boss’ letters at one point.

    The direction from James Hill, who later made Captain Nemo and the Underwater City (1969), is not always the most sophisticated – crude cuts between a butcher raising a knife in the air and girls being grabbed by bobbies. However, there is a fine and exciting climax in a burning pub. The production design is lavish and there is a fine score. There are occasional points that don’t hold up – Michael Osbourne’s identity is far too easily tipped off, and there are slight improbabilities in working some of the logic backwards – like how Angela knew that Edward was the Ripper to send the medical kit to lure Holmes onto the trail if she is someone who almost never goes out. John Neville, some years before more well-known roles in The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1989) and tv’s The X Files (1993-2002), brings a distinctively autocratic hauteur and authority to Holmes.
     


    Copyright Richard Scheib 1999-2012