|
In many ways, it is a surprise to see Black Swan accruing such awards friendly fare and ending up on so many Best of the Year lists for when boiled down it is no more than a 1970s psycho-thriller with artistic pretensions. One suspects that its high profile and acclaim has more to do with some of the names attached, in particular that of director Darren Aronofsky whose previous film The Wrestler (2008) was a favourite of the awards season crowd a couple of years earlier. That and perhaps the fact that Black Swan is set around a ballet company, which has the ring of high art to it. (It would be hard to believe, for instance, the film achieving the same level of acclaim if it were say set in the world of a strip club. In fact, the more you think about it there are surprising similarities between Paul Verhoevens Showgirls (1995) and Black Swan). Darren Aronofsky has been a director of interest ever since his appearance with the reality-bending Pi (1998). Elsewhere, Aronofsky went onto make the highly acclaimed drug addiction film Requiem for a Dream (2000) and a critically divided venture into science-fiction with The Fountain (2006). He also co-wrote David Twohys haunted submarine drama Below (2002) and has been associated with a number of other projects including what eventually became Christopher Nolans Batman Begins (2005), a remake of Robocop (1987), an adaptaion of Frank Millers graphic novel Ronin, The Wolverine, a sequel to X Men Origins: Wolverine (2009), and an original project called Machine Man (2012) about a man who conducts cyborg self-enhancements. One of the more interesting claims that Darren Aronofsky made in publicity interviews for Black Swan was that he had originally intended the heroine to be a love interest for Mickey Rourkes title character in The Wrestler – which would surely have resulted in a film that would have been mind-boggling to say the least. I found Black Swan an interesting film but one that was certainly far short of my Best of the Year list. Maybe I came to it with too many elevated expectations as a result of reading everyone elses Best of the Year lists; maybe I am too familiar with 1970s psycho-thrillers and had a certain ennui with the motifs of the genre that other audiences who greeted the film did not. Black Swan is not even the first psycho-thriller about a dancer cracking up under the strain of a performance with many of the basic ideas here having been conducted nearly eight decades earlier in The Mad Genius (1931). One review I read hit the nail perfectly on the head when they described Black Swan as “a version of Swan Lake (1877) as directed by Brian De Palma.” Brian De Palma had a string of films during the 1970s and early 80s – the likes of Sisters (1973), Obsession (1976), Dressed to Kill (1980), Blow Out (1981), Body Double (1984), Raising Cain (1992) and Femme Fatale (2002) – that specialized in wildly stylistic directorial flourishes for their own sake; plots involving contorted and improbable psychology; and dream sequences and twist endings that frequently made no sense. Many of the elements that Darren Aronofsky wields here – the white swan/black swan prudish girl/whore motif that runs throughout; elaborate dream scenes and even murders that may or may not take place in someones imagination; psychological conditions that would never exist in the real world – could have been grafted on from any of the abovementioned Brian De Palma films. I kept wondering how Black Swan would have emerged if someone like Brian De Palma (or Dario Argento who equally loves to tread in this territory) had directed it. The number of deaths would certainly have been upped – Barbara Hersheys mother would have been targeted, probably Vincent Cassels ballet director too. (If it was an Argento film there would have no doubt been a few other supplementary victims who were unrelated to anything else. Black Swan makes interesting comparison to Argentos Opera (1987), which similarly sets a series of murders backstage of a high art stage production). The dextrous games of double identity and dream/illusion would probably have been the same, although both directors may well have thrown in an additional twist ending that left you unsure what was going on. De Palma would have turned the lesbian love scene into something far more hot and passionate than it is and almost certainly have gotten the two actresses undressed, whereas it feels here like Darren Aronofsky is either being too milquetoast or constrained by his actresses non-nudity clauses to open the scene up and as a result it emerges with barely enough steam to mist a bathroom mirror. Contrast the lesbian love scenes to those in Brian De Palmas Femme Fatale and see how tamely Darren Aronofsky delivers it, even though Aronofksky clearly thinks he is being more adventurous than he is. I am sure I would have enjoyed Black Swan more if Brian De Palma had made it and it had been more honest about being a psycho-thriller. For all his being nominated on various Best Directors lists of the year, Darren Aronofskys style is relatively middle of the road. The sole scene where I felt that he came into his own was the one where Natalie Portman leaves the murder scene and goes on stage where she unexpectedly and triumphally metamorphoses into the black swan. Aronoskys means of showing Natalie Portmans breakdown often seems melodramatic – I never fully worked out what seeing her digitally breaking out into scales and her eyes turning red was all about. Certainly, his depiction of her mental state – involving masturbatory sessions, illusory girl-girl love action, murders and physical transformation into swans – would be preposterously melodramatic in any film with a less able director. Natalie Portmans performance has accrued a great deal of acclaim, even if in the end it is only a one-note performance. The only emotional level she is allowed to play on is one of increasing anxiety. There is not much more to the role than that. It is a performance that is almost entirely relayed physically – she is all lean sinew, withdrawn nervousness and nothing else. Certainly, Portman is doing her own dancing and should be commended for throwing herself into the role. It is at least good to see Mila Kunis moving out of bimbo and light romcom roles – contrast her role here to the vapid performance she delivered in The Book of Eli (2010) earlier in the year to see what extremes she has travelled – although it may require something more substantial yet to convince us that she is more than that. Vincent Cassel is all French arrogance and perfectly suited for the part.
(Nominee for Best Actress (Natalie Portman) and Best Supporting Actor (Vincent Cassel) at this sites Best of 2010 Awards).
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||