That would probably have been the last we heard of George Romero’s Dead saga. However, a funny thing then happened. The early 00s brought a sudden spate of renewed interest and/or homages to Romero’s zombie films. First there was the likes of Resident Evil (2002), 28 Days Later (2002) and House of the Dead (2003), which substantially homaged Romero, and this was followed by the successful remake of Dawn of the Dead (2004). This inspired an industry of films cashing in on the George Romero name/connection – other remakes like Night of the Living Dead 3D (2006) and Day of the Dead (2008); spinoffs like Day of the Dead 2: Contagium (2005), Return of the Living Dead: Necropolis (2005), Return of the Living Dead: Rave to the Grave (2005), Night of the Living Dead: Reanimated (2008) and Night of the Living Dead: Origins (2011); and spoofs like Shaun of the Dead (2004), as well as a mountain of other mostly low-budget zombie films. [Indeed, only a month before Diary of the Dead was released there was another entire zombie mockumentary made with the Spanish [Rec] (2007)]. Amid this renewed interest, Romero found the funding to make a return with Land of the Dead (2005), which rounded off his vision of the Dead saga that he was unable to make in 1985. Land of the Dead was a somewhat weak return, although not without its moments and still had the good old Romero biting social commentary.

Diary of the Dead was a further entry in George Romero’s zombie series. Romero, always an independent filmmaker who worked outside the Hollywood system, had found increasing difficulty over the years finding funding to make his films – a substantial part of the reason his output was so sporadic in the 1990s. With Diary of the Dead, Romero, now in his late 60s, relocated to Toronto and made the film with an unknown cast, shooting on digital video and with a budget of only $2 million (which it should be noted is 14 times less than the Dawn of the Dead remake).

Diary of the Dead is George Romero smartly reinventing his zombies for the 00s. This is a zombie film that sits among the era of the camcorders, digital piracy, cellphone cameras, the blogosphere, My Space and YouTube, all of which are referenced throughout. Aside from the quantum shift in the mode of media that surrounds it, the film itself has been shot on digital video. Moreover, George Romero has made Diary of the Dead as a mockumentary a la The Blair Witch Project (1999), where everything is filmed by a handheld camera supposedly being carried by someone in the midst of the action. [Diary of the Dead went into general release in the US a month after Cloverfield (2008), which likewise used the mockumentary approach to make a monster movie].

Romero does cheat within the mockumentary format to make Diary of the Dead a more commercial film. As Michelle Morgan amusingly notes in her voiceover introduction “I've added music occasionally for effect, hoping to scare you.” Romero also improbably has various of the actors using secondary or cellphone cameras in order to cut his single camera point-of-view up. At one point, Michelle Morgan comes across Josh Close cutting in footage from cctv cameras at the hideout simply so that Romero can include external shots of the vehicles arriving. (If nothing else, you have to complement George Romero on the rigorousness of keeping to the logic of the mockumentary camera). Neither [Rec] nor Cloverfield cheated as much on the first person camera logic; on the other hand, George Romero is far more challenging in the way that he constantly interrogates the role of the filmmaker, asking to what extent the documentary cameraman is complicit in the activities he is filming – Josh Close is seen as having blood on his hands, while his determined obsession to finish the film is seen as placing the others into danger.

Like most of George Romero’s catastrophe films, Diary of the Dead is bitingly satiric. We get anonymous voices on the radio commenting: “We become hysterical about all these people crossing the border into our country. But that’s not the problem anymore. The problem’s people crossing the border between life and death.” There are also the scenes where the party comes across a group of Black men led by Martin Roach who have taken the opportunity to arm themselves and set up their own fortress. “What’s with you?” Josh Close asks, “Why did you stay?” As Roach explains: “Because we got the power. For the first time in our lives, we got the power because everybody else left. All the folks without suntans,” where you can clearly see this it is Romero spinning the zombie film by way of the racial disparities brought out by the Hurricane Katrina disaster. The ending of Diary of the Dead revisits the ending of Night of the Living Dead, showing hicks shooting zombies for fun, including one haunting scene where a female zombie is strung up to a tree by her hair and her body shot away as Michelle Morgan comments in voiceover: “Are we worth saving? You tell me.” It shows a George Romero who has becomes deeply pessimistic about any hope for the human condition.

Mostly, Diary of the Dead is about the issue of independence in the modern media. The film opens with a network news tape of a zombie attack and later we see a government spokesperson trying to dismiss the event as merely a fracas between immigrants. Compare this to the news broadcast about the returned satellite in Night of the Living Dead – here television is no longer a disseminator of information but a tool of government spin. Romero sees that truth is a commodity that has become lost in the complicity between government, the media and commercial interest. As Michelle Morgan notes in one of her voiceovers: “The more voices there are, the truth becomes that much harder to find. It all just becomes noise.” Romero sees the only unadulterated truth lies out there in the freedom of the blogosphere and the film is in effect about the heroic struggle to tell the truth free of mainstream lies. “The mainstream had vanished. It was just us – bloggers, hackers, kids,” comments Michelle Morgan.

Diary of the Dead is George Romero going back to basics and doing what Romero does best and delivering the goods. The low-budget, digital-shot look seems to have greatly freed Romero from the fog that affected his films throughout the 1990s. The low key approach is never better demonstrated than the opening scenes where Romero shows a great deal of directorial sophistication in having a number of things – arriving paramedics, fussing news presenters and the dead returning to life and coming after the living – all within the space of a single sustained shot. There is an enormous amount of creativity to Diary of the Dead. One of the most inventive touches is that of Samuel the deaf Amish zombie hunter – it is a genuine shame that he ended up being disposed of so quickly as this is one of the most original characters in the Dead series.

George Romero also takes the opportunity to return to the trademark gore that was a feature of the original Dawn of the Dead and Day of the Dead but became watered down by the time of Land of the Dead. We get various scenes with a zombie rolling off a hospital bed and its intestines falling out; the novelty of seeing a zombie’s skull and brain melt down after acid is thrown on its head; a head bifurcated by a sword; and the climactic scene where a female zombie is hung from a tree by its hair and the body blown away leaving only the top half of the head still hanging. It feels after several years in limbo that Groege Romero has finally found himself him again and Diary of the Dead is an authentic showing of the good old Romero goods.

Less successful is Romero’s attempts to carp at horror cliches during the shooting of a low-budget horror film with Amy Lalonde, playing a heroine horror being pursued by a mummy, interrupting shooting to ask why heroines in horror films always have to have low necklines, twist their ankles and get their tops ripped off by the monster. Romero clumsily revisits the scene later in the film where the zombified Philip Riccio, still wearing his mummy costume, pursues Amy Lalonde for real, tearing her top off and she tripping and falling, while Josh Close futilely stands over trying to yell “cut”. It is one of the Diary of the Dead’s few moments of humour but feels like a joke that could have easily ended on the cutting room floor.

George Romero conducted a sequel with Survival of the Dead (2009) where Alan Van Sprang who plays the minor role of a fake soldier who invades the RV is expanded to become the central character.

George Romero’s other films include:– Night of the Living Dead (1968); Jack’s Wife/Season of the Witch (1972) about suburban witchcraft; The Crazies (1973), an underrated film about a madness-inducing biospill; Martin (1976), a superb deconstruction of the cinematic vampire myth; Dawn of the Dead/Zombies – Dawn of the Dead (1979); the Stephen King horror comic homage Creepshow (1982); Day of the Dead (1985); Monkey Shines (1988) about a psychic link between a paraplegic and a murderous monkey; Two Evil Eyes (1990), an Edgar Allan Poe collaboration with Dario Argento; The Dark Half (1993), from the Stephen King novel about a writer haunted by an evil doppelganger; Bruiser (2000) about a man whose face suddenly becomes a blank mask; and Land of the Dead (2005). Romero has also produced the Tales from the Darkside (1983-5) and Monsters (1988-9) horror anthology series, as well as the films Deadtime Stories (2009), Deadtime Stories 2 (2010) and the remake of The Crazies (2010). His scripts include Creepshow II (1987), Tales from the Darkside: The Movie (1990) and the remake of Night of the Living Dead (1990).