The Science Fiction, Horror and Fantasy Film Review
Reviews
All Titles
· A – B · C – D
· E – F · G – H
· I – K · L – M
· N – O · P – R
· S – T · U – Z
Sections
Science-Fiction
· A – D · E – K
· L – Q · R – Z
Horror
· A – D · E – K
· L – Q · R – Z
Fantasy
· A – D · E – K
· L – Q · R – Z
New
· Most Recent Additions
Annual Best and Worst
· 2011 · 2010
· 2009 · 2008
· 2007 · 2006
· 2005 · 2004
· 2003 · 2002
· 2001 · 2000
· 1999 · 1998
· 1997 · 1996
· 1995 · 1994
Contact
· Contact This Site
Link to This Page With



    DRACULA
    (Yami no Teio Kyuketsuki Dracula)
    Rating

     
    Japan. 1980.
    Director – Minoru Okazaki, Screenplay – Jean Colan, Tom Palmer & Mary [Marv] Wolfman, Based on the Marvel Comic The Tomb of Dracula, Music – Seiji Yokoyama, Dracula Theme – Michael Bradley & Stephen Wittmack. Production Company – Harmony Gold/Toei Animation.
     

     
    Plot: In present-day Boston, Dracula bursts into a Satanic ceremony – where he is taken for a manifestation of Satan – and abducts Delores, a woman who is about to be sacrificed. But he is overcome with love for her and is unable to drink her blood. The two settle down and have a child, Janus. Meanwhile Frank Drake, the cocky present-day descendant of Dracula, is recruited by a wheelchair-ridden Hans Harker and crossbow-wielding Rachel Van Helsing to form a vampire-hunting team. But then Janus is killed by the revenge-seeking Satanists (although is later divinely resurrected as an avatar of good). Meanwhile Satan, who made Dracula a vampire, strips Dracula of his vampirism for abusing his power, forcing Dracula go on a quest to find another vampire who will restore his powers.
     

     
    This quite obscure Japanese film is not an adaption of Bram Stoker, as the title mistakenly leads some people to think, but rather an adaptation of a Marvel Comic, The Tomb of Dracula (1972-80). [This was the same comic-book that gave birth to the character of Blade, who was later incarnated in his own comic-book and as a popular series of films beginning with Blade (1998)]. Several of the Marvel writers are involved in the film – Marv Wolfman (whose name is amusingly misspelt as Mary Wolfman) and Gene Colan (whose name is similarly feminized as Jean Colan).

    Part of the problem here is that the screenwriters have attempted to compact the entire dramatics of the comic’s first two year run into a single plot. And what ends up on screen is probably one of the most unusual Dracula films ever conceived. The bizarrely contrived plot includes not only Dracula, but vampire hunters, Satanists, appearances from Satan himself, rival vampires, zombies and Dracula’s son who is divinely raised from the dead and turned into some sort of superhero-come-avatar-of-Good. In this wild jangle sides cannot help but get confused – even Satan is reduced to little more than just another super-villain. In one of its better parts the film constructs an origin story for Dracula, identifying him in all but name with Vlad the Impaler, and making him a good person who was corrupted in the name of defending his homeland to be resurrected by Satan. But creating sympathy for Dracula confuses the issue – it makes the vampire hunters seem obsessive; even the Almighty in creating someone to destroy Dracula cannot help but seem unforgiving.

    But for all the torrid dramatics that the plot contorts, surprisingly little of it ever translates into visual excitement. The animation is very limited – it does appropriate the robust dramatic style of the Marvel Comics artists of the 1970s, but the fact that only the most limited part of the drawn action moves at one time virtually kills excitement off. What there is is very melodramatic and flat. The characters are insipid and of little depth.
     


    Copyright Richard Scheib 1999-2012