|
Gacy is one amid the modern fad for indie-produced true-life serial killer biopics, joining the likes of Ed Gein (2000), Dahmer (2002), Nightstalker (2002), Ted Bundy (2002), Monster (2003), Evilenko (2004), The Hillside Strangler (2004), Starkweather (2004), The Zodiac (2005), Karla (2006), Lonely Hearts (2006), Ed Gein: The Butcher of Plainfield (2007), Zodiac (2007), The Alphabet Killer (2008), B.T.K. (2008) and Drifter: Henry Lee Lucas (2009). The film is extremely faithful to the details of the John Wayne Gacy case. The screenplay throws in numerous minor details about Gacy his street light campaign, his prior career managing a fried chicken franchise, his heart problems, the stolen car incident, and gives an accurately detailed recreation of the episode where he abducted Jeffrey Ringall, offering him a joint as a pretext to chloroforming him, then raping him while imprisoned in a set of stocks and finally leaving him tied up in the park that shows that the writers have at least done their research. Although, at other times, Gacy is clearly at odds with the real story the film omits an entire part of the story where the police searched Gacys house once, found items from the victims and brought Gacy in for questioning but let him go without charges despite finding a great deal of circumstantial evidence in the house. For some reason, an entire incident with the two detectives sitting outside his house and following Gacy about has been entirely invented in place of this part of the story. Gacy is also the dullest of the modern serial killer biopics. Clive Saunderss directorial style is unexciting. Moreover, unless one has some close, certainly not just casual, familiarity with the John Wayne Gacy case, it is not clear for some time what is going on. The film starts in dull and slowly anyone who sits down to watch the film without any knowledge of the Gacy case will undoubtedly be puzzled, not to mention bored, by the goings on early in the piece about foul smells coming from under the house, Gacys debt problems and him trying to hustle young men. The film demands too much in the way of foreknowledge from its audience. It does pick up about halfway through with a few decent shock images the scene where Mark Holton seduces the Jeffrey Ringall equivalent, gets him to step into his car and share a joint before he chloroforms him and the guy then comes around in a set of stocks; another scene where a guy comes to the door and next we see Mark Holton trying to drown him in a bath. The other big disappointment about the film is the casting of Mark Holton as Gacy. A few years ago, Holton was playing roles as overweight teen bullies in films like Pee-Wees Big Adventure (1985), Teen Wolf (1985) and sequel and Leprechaun (1993). However, Holton does not have the range to play Gacy, he only seems a soft-headed and muddling do-gooder with a dark side. There seems little calculating threat and intelligence in Holtons performance, certainly none of the salesman charisma that the real-life Gacy was said to possess. A much more charismatic portrayal of John Wayne Gacy was given by Brian Dennehy in the tv mini-series To Catch a Killer (1992).
A number of other films in recent years have dealt with John Wayne Gacy, including Dear Mr Gacy (2010), a true-life film about a student who was allowed to interview Gacy for a term paper; Gacy House (2010) about ghost hunters encountering phenomena in Gacys house; and the bizarre Dahmer vs Gacy (2011) involving the cloning of famous serial killers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||