|
This was a further remake of the story, although is the most variant version attempted yet. This is especially noticeable when it comes to the opening credits, which take place against the backdrop of contemporary Los Angeles as opposed to Victorian London where all the other versions of the story take place. There is still a lodger (in the person of the mysteriously charming Simon Baker the role having been taken back to the way it was originally conceived in the Alfred Hitchcock version) who now rents the bungalow at the back of the property as opposed to the upstairs flat. The landlords are no longer a family but a couple with domestic issues, including the wife having a history of mental illness to such extent that her husband starts to believe that the lodger might only exist in her head. In a more radical move, rather than a subplot where the lodger becomes attracted to the daughter of the household, the housewife now develops a sexual attraction to the lodger as an alternative to her unhappy marriage, even appears to become complicit in helping cover his activities up. Surprisingly, the Jack the Ripper angle is still there, although this is now a serial killer in the present-day who is conducting a series of Ripper copycat killings. [Surprisingly, The Lodger makes for the second work of 2009 to feature a Jack the Ripper copycat after the superior and much better researched British tv mini-series Whitechapel (2009)]. This version also adds a parallel plot, a police procedural that follows a cliched dogged investigator (Alfred Molina) as he goes out on a limb to follow his leads, which was never there in the original. The remake does at least manage to homage the classic scene from the Hitchcock version where the lodger takes down the portraits in the room feeling unnerved by their eyes staring at him. The Lodger was the feature-length directing-writing debut of David Ondaatje, the nephew of celebrated Canadian author Michael Ondaatje, best known for the book that became The English Patient (1996). Mostly, David Ondaatjes handling is routine. The police procedural aspect, which does not exist in most other versions of the story, is given far more screen time that the familys suspicions about the identity of the lodger, but proves nothing standout. Moreover, Ondaatje plays hard and fast with the facts of the Jack the Ripper case, mostly adhering to canon but inventing suspects when it suits him to do so.
Far more interesting is the latter half of the film where David Ondaatje winds the script in a constantly twisting pretzel that makes us think every person in the principal cast may be the killer husband Donal Logue going off to work with his black bag, wife Hope Davis with her history of mental illness, with even detective Alfred Molina falling under suspicion at one point and causes us to doubt whether there is a lodger at all or if they are just a figment of Hope Daviss imagination. The film reaches an interesting ending that abandons Marie Belloc Lowndes more traditional thriller plotting and heads entirely into M. Night Shyamalan territory, before a coda that shows this too to be the wrong conclusion. It is during this half that The Lodger 2009 comes to life and David Ondaatje has some fun weaving the audience into a genuine mind-bender.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||