|
[Rec] 2 follows directly on from [Rec] the two could be run together without a break. [Rec] was not a film that was burning for a sequel it worked perfectly well as a self-contained unit. That said, [Rec] 2 does a fair to reasonable job of following directly on. The main problem is that the novelty of the approach and the twist ending have given away much of the effectiveness a second time around. To its credit, [Rec] 2 does more of a job of exploring the nature and background of the possession, which was always one of the aspects that I thought did not work in the original, in trying to give a supernatural/spiritual issue a physical explanation. There is a particularly good intro where the soldiers head in and encounter the zombies before the character that we thought was the health ministry official (Jonathan Mellor) suddenly produces a crucifix and starts praying, which has the effect of halting the zombie in its tracks. There are various scenes similar to what we had last time with people prowling around in the dark and/or sickly green infra-red light and zombies popping out to attack. Much of this is the same as in the first film, although there are some unnerving scenes as people head up into crawlspaces and zombies start rapidly advancing towards them by torchlight and the like. There is one way-out scene where a zombie woman gets a rocket in her face and staggers crazedly down a hallway with her head lit up. The film also manages a good surprise at its end that plays on the shock abrupt ending of the original. [Rec] 2 is also weaker than the first film, in large part due to the watering down the cleanness of the first films approach. The single camera viewpoint is often broken up by footage from cameras mounted into the soldiers headgear. Here we see numerous point-of-view shots with soldiers running around holding guns up in front of the camera, exactly as though we were in the midst of a first-person-shooter game like Doom. This does lead to one accomplished scene seen reflected in a mirror as an infected soldier hides in a bathroom and we see him blow his own head off rather than succumb. For some reason, Balaguero and Plaza now improbably have two different crews with cameras inside the house simultaneously with the middle of the film doing a flip to show everything that has been happening from the point-of-view of the second group. This break-up of the cameras and double narrative disrupts the clean neatness that the original held with its single camera mockumentary style. The splitting of the story and the doubling back to tell things from a different perspective is odd like some of the elliptical dramas and simultaneous interwoven storylines of a film like Go (1999). It feels more like it is there because the films A story did not have enough to it to sustain the running time. One of the other complaints is the shoddy subtitling on this English-language dvd seen here. The apostrophes in words like isnt are rendered as isn_t and the like, while the subtitles also insist that the name of one of the characters is Laora, even though the end credits and even the label on his videocamera feed refers to him as Larra.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||