|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Science-Fiction |
|
|
| Horror |
|
|
| Fantasy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KING RALPH
Rating: 
USA/UK. 1991.
Director/Screenplay David S. Ward, Based on the Novel Headlong by Emlyn Williams, Producer Jack Brodsky, Photography Kenneth McMillan, Music James Newton Howard, Special Effects Supervisor John Morris, Makeup Peter Robb-King, Production Design Simon Holland. Production Company Universal/Mirage/Ibro.
Cast:
John Goodman (Ralph Jones), Peter OToole (Cedric Willingham), Camille Coduri (Miranda Greene), John Hurt (Lord Percival Graves), Richard Griffiths (Duncan Phipps), Leslie Phillips (Gordon Halliwell), James Villiers (Geoffrey Hale), Joely Richardson (Princess Anna), Rudolph Walker (King Mulambon), Julian Glover (King Gustav)
Plot: The British Royal Family are all brought together for a portrait only the photographers equipment short circuits and they are all electrocuted. A massive search is begun for an heir to the throne. One is finally located in Las Vegas nightclub singer Ralph Jones the Duke of Warren had an affair with Ralphs grandmother, making Ralph an illegitimate heir but nevertheless the king. But in England the unsophisticated Ralph has some difficulty in adjusting to the stately ways required of a King of England. Meanwhile Lord Perceval Graves, a descendant along the Stuart line, wants the throne and determines to do all he can to embarrass Ralph and force him out.
This is arguably a science-fiction film in the same sense that films like Seven Days in May (1964) and The Man (1972), and tv series such as A Very British Coup (1987) and To Play the King (1995) are science-fiction they are speculative What If? questions about political scenarios. Certainly King Ralph is such a scenario, and if there were any doubts, surely the absurd improbability of the films scenario a slobbish Las Vegas nightclub singer ascending to the British throne must classify it as sheer fantasy.
The film is the British, in a very American way, poking fun at themselves and their Royal sacred cows. The material is fairly weak. The plot seems to have been constructed from a Comedy Writing 101 class formula there is the requisite villain, the pure-hearted girl, the easygoing heros struggle between duty and himself, ample room allowed for lots of slapstick tomfoolery, and a colossal cop-out ending the even more improbable twist that manservant Peter OToole is really an heir too. The face-value flatness of the material is enlivened though by John Goodman, one of the finest and most versatile comic stars in contemporary American cinema. The films best moments involve Goodman in an amusing series of vignettes poking fun at Royal and upper-class mores playing cricket like it was a game of baseball, throwing frisbees with the Royal corgis, accidentally nicking ears during a knighting, getting china cups stuck on his finger while learning the art of tea-drinking and trying to make sense of terms like spotted dick. And theres an amusing series of lines based on a potential misinterpretation of fox hunting: Do you do a bit of fox hunting? Yes, I used to go out to the clubs every weekend. But theres not really much more to the film than that.
Copyright Richard Scheib 1999-2012
|