|
Mr. Nobody is being sold as a science-fiction film, even if this is somewhat deceptive. The film expends much effort in creating a densely colourful picture of the future futuristic cityscapes stretching out, glassed monorail tubes with tv broadcast around the glass, people that walk through the background encased in plastic bubbles, Jared Letos psychiatrist (Allan Corduner) with a tattooed face. Later we journey to Mars aboard a spaceship filled with cryogenic sleepers and venture out onto the Martian surface where both have been envisioned with a great deal of credible technical detail. The odd thing about these science-fiction elements is that while the promotion focuses on them, they are not what the film is about (even though it otherwise falls well within genre confines). The future scenes are only a narrated wraparound that takes us back through Jared Letos life, while the Martian scenes are no more than a science-fiction novel that Leto is writing in one of the minor alternate timelines. You could have removed the future and Martian scenes and made little difference to the story. Eventually, Mr. Nobody reveals itself as something much more mundane. It is a scenario akin to films like Run Lola Run (1998), Sliding Doors (1998) or The Butterfly Effect (2004) that follows the protagonist through different diverging timelines according to a choice that was made one way or another. Unlike these other films, which clearly delineate the difference in the alternate pathways, Mr. Nobody is constantly creating multiple branches within each divergence such that one soon becomes lost as to which thread they are in at any one point. Maybe more than any of these, one is reminded of Providence (1977), which similarly had an old man telling a story and changing aspects within it at whim. The problem with Mr. Nobody is that Jaco Van Dormael stretches for epic ideas. The film is filled with huge concepts taken from physics with Jared Leto even giving lectures about the Butterfly Effect, string theory, chaos theory, entropy, the Big Crunch, Schroedingers Cat and ideas from psychology on innate behaviour or the science of attraction. Yet for all that, Jaco Van Dormael only seems to have a surface idea of what many of these ideas are. String theory and the essence of Schroedingers Cat (even though such is not mentioned) are made into an argument for the many-worlds theory (in actuality, Schroedingers Cat is nothing more than a thought experiment to illustrate the absurdity of quantum wave functions). What we have seems to be a glib artists fancy that latches onto ideas with little attention to the substance of such concepts. More so than that even, Mr. Nobody seems filled with far too many ideas for its own good. Theres a scene where Jaco Van Dormael pulls back to let Jared Leto look behind the curtain of reality and see that the city streets around him are a giant facade, with visions of helicopters winching blocks of seawater into place to form the ocean, while later we see workmen rolling giant strips of roading into place. Its a fascinating Philip K. Dickian idea but what it means, what relevance it has to the story is unclear as it is never mentioned again. Elsewhere at one point, we have a brief version of the scenario being played out by cave-people. Other pieces dont make sense like Jared Leto finding a video messages from his aged future self, made on the theory that time is turning backwards and his future self knows exactly what is happening at this moment. Daniel Mays journalist rightly asks the question of how one man can have multiple conflicting and contradictory views of what happened in his own life, but again there is no answer to such a perfectly reasonable question. The only answer that we seem to get is the ridiculous one that everything seems to be dreamed up by a five-year-old boy caught between decisions on a train platform, but how a young boy has the imagination let alone the emotional complexity to dream up such complicated scenarios of adult life is probably one of the films least plausible aspects. Mr. Nobody works well in places, especially when it comes to the scenes depicting the love story between the teenage hero and his stepsister. If nothing else, you do have to credit Jaco Van Dormael for the vast conceptual ambition of his ideas, if not exactly for his coherence at presenting them on screen.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||